Blog — Advancing Analytics

Jev: The Smarter, Cheaper Way to Do Enterprise AI Automation?

Written by Bev Manz | 23/09/2026, 12:18

The Era of Mathematical Certainty: What Used to Work

For years in data science, if you wanted deterministic reliability for classification tasks, you built a custom BERT model. I've always appreciated BERT because it gave us deterministic, repeatable classifications; it didn't hallucinate outside its label space, and with enough training data it could get remarkably accurate. But getting there meant dealing with the heavy MLOps lift of custom training pipelines, expensive data labelling, and continuous fine-tuning.

Then came Generative AI. Suddenly, we had LLMs capable of complex reasoning out of the box with zero training. But they predict text sequentially, and that comes with a massive operational catch when building automated pipelines.

The Generative Era: What We’ve Learnt the Hard Way

To be clear: the problem with generative models in 2026 isn't JSON parsing. Modern frontier models have largely solved syntax errors with "structured output" modes. The real, persisting problems in enterprise automation are semantic variance and hallucinated confidence.

When you ask a generative model to classify a customer ticket, it is still generating text under the hood. You might want it to select the canonical category Billing Query, but depending on the prompt or the temperature, it might generate Billing Question, Payment Query or Invoice Issue. This lack of categorical determinism breaks downstream systems that expect exact string matches.

Yes, there are prompt engineering workarounds to force reliable classifications, but they hit a hard ceiling:

    • Numbered Categories and the Mapping Problem: A common tactic is assigning integers to intents (e.g., instructing the model to output 17 for Invoice Issue) to bypass text generation entirely. While this drastically improves formatting consistency, it masks the underlying reasoning. When the model returns 17, is it mathematically confident in that mapping, or is it simply hallucinating a valid integer that satisfies your formatting rule? You guarantee the syntax, but you completely lose semantic trust. Then there's the cost of chasing accuracy, every workaround above still runs on a full generative model, and closing the reliability gap rarely means a cheaper prompt, it usually means a bigger, more expensive one. At enterprise volume, that's not a rounding error; it's the difference between automation that pays for itself and automation that doesn't. 
    • The Accuracy Ceiling: Even with strict JSON schemas and few-shot prompting, we've consistently found that generative LLM classification accuracy plateaus well short of what's needed for full automation - closing that last gap usually means reaching for far larger, more expensive models, and even then the gains can be inconsistent.

More dangerously, we have completely lost the ability to use confidence scores for automated routing. Generative LLMs are notoriously overconfident; if you prompt an LLM to output its probability of being correct, it will happily output 99% on a completely hallucinated category. If a model can classify something correctly 95% of the time but cannot mathematically tell you which 5% it is unsure about, you cannot safely automate around it.

Enter Jev: The "System One" Solution

Jev from TypeSafe AI feels like the exact middle ground we've been waiting for. Jev is a specialised "System One" decision model. It abandons string generation entirely, but unlike BERT, you don't have to custom-train it. The model's launch drew significant press coverage at launch for tackling this overconfidence problem head-on [3]

Because the output space is bounded, Jev sidesteps the token-by-token loop. It works seamlessly out of the box by feeding unstructured data alongside a strict schema of API primitives. For example, Jev exposes three core query types:

    • Choice: Pick 1 of up to 255 predefined categorical options [4].
    • Score: Output a numeric value on a predefined scale.
    • Noul: A calibrated yes/no boolean probability.

Jev's hardware-aware parallel sampler evaluates all those predefined options simultaneously in a single forward pass. This maps the context and returns the exact canonical string you requested; eliminating schema/formatting errors by design.

The real shift is how it's trained. Using Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions, Jev doesn't optimize for what sounds good to a human like standard RLHF models; it optimises for epistemic honesty.

When Jev outputs a result, it looks like this:

{
  "choice": "Billing Query",
  "confidence": 0.92,
  "score": 85
}

That confidence score is mathematically calibrated. If Jev says it is 92% confident, it is actually correct 92% of the time. This allows engineering teams to finally build robust routing thresholds: act autonomously on anything above 90% confidence and route the uncertain edge cases to a human.

Two Theoretical Enterprise AI Use Cases

From my perspective, it is always easier to understand benefits when we look at real business cases, and when you dig into it, the impact of this architecture becomes undeniable when we consider the future potential application against two of the biggest bottlenecks in enterprise automation: high complexity decisioning and high-volume routing.

1. Intelligent Decisioning in Insurance (Claims & Underwriting)

UK insurers face a growing volume of First Notification of Loss (FNOL) documents, medical reports, and policy submissions, all of which require fast, accurate triage. The goal for AI here is clear: read these submissions to instantly assess, score, and flag risk before it bottlenecks the pipeline.

    • Without AI: UK insurers rely on expensive human adjusters and underwriters to manually review every document. Administrative friction and manual review account for a massive share of underwriting operational expenses, driving cycle times into weeks and eroding profit margins.
    • With Gen AI: Conversational LLMs excel at summarizing the documents, but they struggle with the final, deterministic decision. Because generative models suffer from semantic variance and uncalibrated, hallucinated confidence, engineering teams cannot mathematically trust an LLM to auto-approve or triage a policy. If an LLM is 85% accurate but confidently hallucinates on the remaining 15%, you are forced to keep expensive senior underwriters checking every routine file - drastically capping your ROI.
    • With Jev: Underwriting requires mathematical certainty. By mapping a complex submission to a structured schema (e.g., using Jev's Score primitive to rank risk out of 100), insurers gain a calibrated, defensible signal for triage. Because Jev is calibrated for epistemic honesty, a 98% confidence score means you can mathematically trust the system to auto-route low-risk submissions or flag high-risk files for manual review, rather than relying on a generative model's uncalibrated sense of certainty.

2. High-Volume Telephony Intent Classification

If underwriting is the most complex AI workload, telephony is undeniably the most expensive and latency-sensitive channel to automate. To put the scale into perspective: recent analysis from the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee found that HMRC received roughly 37 million inbound calls in a single year [1].

    • Without AI: According to ContactBabel's 2024 UK Contact Centre Decision-Makers' Guide, the average inbound customer service call costs an organisation roughly £5.58 to handle via human agents [2]. At 37 million calls a year, that's £206.46 million spent annually just to answer the phone, figure out why a customer is calling, and route them to the right department.
    • With Gen AI: Running all-in generative AI voice agents (combining Speech-to-Text, LLM inference, and Text-to-Speech) carries meaningful per-minute API costs at scale. Assuming roughly one minute of live audio per call, a defensible baseline covering the initial greeting, the customer explaining their issue, the model processing intent, and the routing confirmation, running a generative LLM at this volume incurs heavy compounding expenses. Worse, autoregressive token generation takes seconds - leaving the caller waiting in awkward silence while the LLM generates its decision token by token. 
    • With Jev: By swapping a generative conversational model for Jev, latency drops to a vendor-reported 70–500 milliseconds end-to-end (evaluated under standard cloud API conditions with typical text state payloads) [4], giving customers instant, human-like reaction times. Because Jev doesn't generate tokens autoregressively, TypeSafe provides output tokens free of charge, with input tokens priced at $0.042 (approximately £0.03) per million tokens as of its September 2026 launch [4].

For real-time branching logic, whether you are pricing a policy or routing a live voice call, we potentially have an architecture here that is designed to be right, rather than just sound right.  As agentic AI becomes more embedded in enterprise workflows, the systems that scale won't be the ones that sound the most impressive — they'll be the ones making these decisions cheaper and faster, at the volume automation actually demands.

These two examples are just the sharpest illustrations of the pattern, not the limit of it. The same architecture applies anywhere a business makes the same kind of bounded decision at volume and needs to trust the confidence score attached to it, retail returns and fraud triage, healthcare intake prioritisation, HR ticket routing, logistics exception handling, legal document classification. None of these are use cases we've built out here; they're simply other places the same underlying problem, semantic variance and hallucinated confidence, shows up once you start looking for it 

Test it Out on the Example You Just Read

The fastest way to get a feel for calibrated decisioning is to point Jev at a live call transcript and watch it triage in real time. Below, a banking contact centre's Choice primitive is configured with 51 canonical categories — well within Jev's 255-option ceiling — covering everything from card disputes to trust and estate planning. As each turn comes in, Jev classifies it, scores urgency, and applies the same 90%-confidence routing rule this post has used throughout: clear it automatically, or send it to a human.

The two transcripts below show both outcomes — a routine login issue that resolves entirely through automation, and a genuinely ambiguous fraud dispute that correctly drops below the threshold and escalates to a person.

If you want to move beyond basic classification and analyze live, multi-turn conversations, you can point Jev at a full transcript line-by-line.

By separating conversational filler and holds ("Continuation / Acknowledgment") from substantive banking topics—and using a lookback attribution window so hold times carry forward into the active intent—you can precisely quantify how much time a customer spends on each part of a call. Applying a strict 90% confidence threshold ensures that standard, clear-cut queries are auto-routed, while deeply complex or ambiguous cases (like multi-jurisdictional fraud disputes) automatically trigger a human handover.

Here is the complete implementation script demonstrating realistic telemetry across complex banking transcripts:

import os
import httpx
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from dotenv import load_dotenv

# Load environment variables
load_dotenv()

API_KEY = os.getenv("TYPESAFE_API_KEY")
API_URL = "https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone"

BANKING_CRITERIA = {
    "Continuation / Acknowledgment": "General greetings, pleasantries, polite acknowledgments, conversational filler, brief confirmations, system processing pauses, or customer hold times that do not introduce a new substantive banking topic.",
    "Checking & Savings Account Opening": "Applications and onboarding for new personal deposit accounts",
    "Account Closure & Liquidation": "Closing existing accounts and transferring remaining balances",
    "Overdue Balance & Overdraft Fees": "Queries regarding negative balances, overdraft charges, and grace periods",
    "Debit Card Activation & PIN Reset": "Activating new plastic, changing PINs, or unlocking cards",
    "Lost, Stolen, or Damaged Cards": "Reporting compromised cards and ordering emergency replacements",
    "ATM Cash Withdrawal Disputes": "Investigating failed dispenser cash drops or incorrect dispense amounts",
    "Domestic ACH & Faster Payments": "Checking status of local clearing house transfers and direct debits",
    "International SWIFT & Wire Transfers": "Initiating, tracking, or investigating global cross-border telegraphic transfers",
    "Foreign Exchange & Currency Conversion": "Spot FX trades, multi-currency wallet management, and exchange rates",
    "Suspicious Activity & Fraud Alerts": "Reporting unauthorized transactions, phishing scams, and card skimming",
    "Account Freeze & AML Compliance Holds": "Unlocking accounts placed on hold due to anti-money laundering reviews",
    "Personal Loan Applications": "Inquiries and underwriting status for unsecured instalment loans",
    "Mortgage Pre-Approval & Underwriting": "Home loan applications, property valuations, and lending criteria",
    "Mortgage Refinancing & Rate Locks": "Locking fixed rates or refinancing existing residential mortgages",
    "Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC)": "Drawing or managing credit secured against property equity",
    "Credit Card Rewards & Cashback": "Redeeming loyalty points, travel milestones, or statement cashback",
    "Credit Limit Increase Requests": "Applying for higher credit ceilings on revolving credit lines",
    "Credit Card Balance Transfers": "Moving balances from external lenders onto promotional 0% APR cards",
    "Business Checking & Corporate Accounts": "Commercial banking operations, partnership accounts, and entity setup",
    "Merchant Services & POS Terminals": "Credit card processing gateways, POS hardware, and daily merchant payouts",
    "Commercial Real Estate Lending": "Financing for office buildings, retail spaces, and industrial properties",
    "Corporate Treasury & Cash Management": "Liquidity sweeps, multi-entity pooling, and interest-bearing sweeps",
    "Letter of Credit & Trade Finance": "Import/export documentary credits, bills of lading, and guarantees",
    "Payroll Processing & Direct Deposit": "Corporate bulk salary payments and automated tax filings",
    "Business Line of Credit": "Working capital financing and revolving corporate credit facilities",
    "SBA & Government-Backed Small Business Loans": "Small business administration loan application support and servicing",
    "Wealth Management & Advisory Services": "High-net-worth portfolio planning, asset allocation, and private banking",
    "Brokerage & Equity Trading": "Buying/selling stocks, bonds, ETFs, and options via self-directed accounts",
    "Mutual Funds & Index Portfolios": "Long-term investment fund management and dividend reinvestment",
    "Retirement Accounts (IRA / 401k / SIPP)": "Tax-advantaged pension contributions, rollovers, and early withdrawal penalties",
    "Cryptocurrency & Digital Asset Services": "Buying, selling, or storing supported digital assets via banking portals",
    "Trust and Estate Planning Services": "Setting up testamentary trusts, executing estates, and fiduciary care",
    "Tax Document Issuance (1099 / Statements)": "Downloading year-end tax certificates, interest statements, and capital gains reports",
    "Certificate of Deposit (CD) Maturation": "Opening high-yield fixed term deposits or handling maturity rollovers",
    "Joint Account Holder Management": "Adding or removing secondary signatories and mandate updates",
    "Power of Attorney & Legal Signatures": "Submitting legal mandates for managing incapacitated account holders",
    "Safe Deposit Box Rentals": "Accessing vault lockers, key replacements, and annual rental renewals",
    "Online Banking Login & 2FA Issues": "Troubleshooting biometric authentication, browser errors, SMS OTP codes, and login credentials",
    "Mobile Banking App Crashes": "Reporting UI bugs, check-deposit scanner failures, and crash dumps",
    "Statement & Document Generation": "Requesting official bank reference letters, certified statements, and audits",
    "Standing Orders & Direct Debit Mandates": "Setting up, modifying, or cancelling recurring automated bill payments",
    "Overdraft Protection Setup": "Linking backup savings accounts to prevent checking account overdrafts",
    "Invoicing & Billing Software Integration": "Connecting accounting software (Xero/QuickBooks) to corporate feeds",
    "Bank Fee Waivers & Goodwill Refunds": "Requesting reversal of monthly maintenance fees or late penalties",
    "Hardship & Debt Forbearance Programs": "Applying for temporary loan payment holidays or structured debt relief",
    "KYC / Identity Verification Updates": "Submitting updated proof of address, passports, or visa documentation",
    "Insolvency & Bankruptcy Notifications": "Informing the bank of personal bankruptcy filings or company liquidation",
    "Student & Youth Banking Accounts": "Managing specialized accounts with fee exemptions for students",
    "Green & Sustainable Finance Options": "Inquiring about eco-friendly mortgages, green car loans, or carbon-offset accounts"
}

def classify_turn(speaker: str, text: str, client: httpx.Client):
    payload = {
        "state": f"Speaker ({speaker}): {text}",
        "model": "jev-latest",
        "questions": {
            "intent": {
                "type": "choice",
                "instructions": "Which banking topic or conversation phase best classifies this specific statement?",
                "criteria": BANKING_CRITERIA
            },
            "is_urgent": {
                "type": "noul",
                "instructions": "Does this statement convey an urgent financial threat, fraud risk, or critical banking emergency?"
            }
        }
    }
    
    headers = {
        "Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}",
        "Content-Type": "application/json"
    }
    
    response = client.post(API_URL, json=payload, headers=headers)
    if response.status_code != 200:
        return "Unknown", 0.0, 0.0
        
    data = response.json().get("answers", {})
    choice_res = data.get("intent", {})
    noul_res = data.get("is_urgent", {})
    
    return (
        choice_res.get("choice", "Unknown"),
        choice_res.get("confidence", 0.0),
        noul_res.get("noul", 0.0)
    )

def analyze_banking_transcript(transcript_id: int, lines: list):
    print(f"\n==================================================")
    print(f" BANKING TRANSCRIPT {transcript_id} (Lookback Telemetry)")
    print(f"==================================================")
    
    substantive_time_seconds = {}
    active_topic = "Continuation / Acknowledgment"
    THRESHOLD = 0.90
    
    current_time = datetime(2026, 9, 21, 14, 0, 0)
    turn_records = []

    with httpx.Client() as client:
        for turn in lines:
            if not turn.strip():
                continue
            
            if ":" in turn:
                speaker, text = turn.split(":", 1)
                speaker = speaker.strip()
                text = text.strip()
            else:
                speaker = "Unknown"
                text = turn.strip()
                
            if "hold" in text.lower() or "pause" in text.lower() or "investigat" in text.lower():
                duration_sec = 35
            else:
                word_count = len(text.split())
                duration_sec = max(6, int(word_count / 2.0))
            
            start_timestamp = current_time.strftime("%H:%M:%S")
            end_time = current_time + timedelta(seconds=duration_sec)
            end_timestamp = end_time.strftime("%H:%M:%S")
            
            category, confidence, urgency = classify_turn(speaker, text, client)
            
            if speaker.lower() == "agent":
                status = "[AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]"
            else:
                status = "AUTO-ROUTED" if confidence >= THRESHOLD else "HUMAN ESCALATE"
            
            turn_records.append({
                "start": start_timestamp,
                "end": end_timestamp,
                "duration": duration_sec,
                "speaker": speaker,
                "text": text,
                "category": category,
                "confidence": confidence,
                "urgency": urgency,
                "status": status
            })
            
            current_time = end_time

        accumulated_buffer = 0
        
        for record in turn_records:
            cat = record["category"]
            dur = record["duration"]
            
            if cat != "Continuation / Acknowledgment":
                active_topic = cat
                total_dur_to_add = dur + accumulated_buffer
                substantive_time_seconds[active_topic] = substantive_time_seconds.get(active_topic, 0) + total_dur_to_add
                accumulated_buffer = 0
            else:
                if active_topic != "Continuation / Acknowledgment":
                    accumulated_buffer += dur

            print(f"[{record['start']} - {record['end']}] ({record['duration']}s) [{record['speaker']}]")
            print(f"  \"{record['text']}\"")
            print(f"  └─> Topic: {record['category']} (Conf: {record['confidence']:.2f}) | Urgency: {record['urgency']:.2f} | Routing: {record['status']}\n")
            
    print(f"--- Transcript {transcript_id} Cumulative Time-on-Topic (with Lookback Attribution) ---")
    for topic, secs in sorted(substantive_time_seconds.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True):
        print(f"  • {topic}: {secs} seconds ({secs / 60:.1f} mins)")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    if not API_KEY:
        print("Error: TYPESAFE_API_KEY environment variable is not set.")
        exit(1)
        
    banking_transcripts = [
        # Transcript 1: Clean, unambiguous intent mapping with high confidence
        [
            "Agent: Thank you for calling Northbridge Banking Group, my name is Marcus. How may I assist your accounts today?",
            "Customer: Hi, I'm calling because my online banking login has been locked out and my two-factor authentication SMS codes are not coming through.",
            "Agent: I can certainly look into your profile status right now. Please hold for just a moment while I pull up your secure records.",
            "Agent: Thank you for holding. Are you currently experiencing these login issues with our web portal or through the mobile application?",
            "Customer: It's definitely the web portal; my 2FA authentication SMS code isn't arriving when I try to authorize our international SWIFT wire transfer to Frankfurt.",
            "Agent: Let me trigger a secondary authentication reset for your online profile right now.",
            "Customer: Thanks. Once that wire clears, I also want to move £250,000 from my commercial savings into our managed equity portfolio."
        ],
        # Transcript 2: Complex Fraud Dispute triggering a valid Human Escalation due to multi-jurisdictional ambiguity
        [
            "Agent: Welcome to Northbridge Banking Group, how can I help you today?",
            "Customer: I need urgent help with a multi-party international dispute involving compromised crypto wallet linkages and cross-border merchant chargebacks that span three different legal jurisdictions.",
            "Agent: That sounds extremely complex and sensitive. I am going to place you on an extended security hold while I escalate your case directly to our Senior Fraud and Legal Arbitration Directorate.",
            "Agent: Thank you for holding. Our fraud directors have reviewed the preliminary notes, and a specialized human agent is taking over the line to walk you through the evidentiary affidavit.",
            "Customer: Thank you, please also make sure nobody touches my mortgage direct debit scheduled for tomorrow morning while this is sorted."
        ]
    ]
    
    for idx, t_lines in enumerate(banking_transcripts, start=1):
        analyze_banking_transcript(idx, t_lines)

Output — Transcript 1 (routine login issue, resolves entirely through automation):

==================================================
 BANKING TRANSCRIPT 1 (Lookback Telemetry)
==================================================
[14:00:00 - 14:00:09] (9s) [Agent]
  "Thank you for calling Northbridge Banking Group, my name is Marcus. How may I assist your accounts today?"
  └─> Topic: Continuation / Acknowledgment (Conf: 1.00) | Urgency: 0.01 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:00:09 - 14:00:20] (11s) [Customer]
  "Hi, I'm calling because my online banking login has been locked out and my two-factor authentication SMS codes are not coming through."
  └─> Topic: Online Banking Login & 2FA Issues (Conf: 1.00) | Urgency: 0.27 | Routing: AUTO-ROUTED

[14:00:20 - 14:00:55] (35s) [Agent]
  "I can certainly look into your profile status right now. Please hold for just a moment while I pull up your secure records."
  └─> Topic: Continuation / Acknowledgment (Conf: 1.00) | Urgency: 0.02 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:00:55 - 14:01:30] (35s) [Agent]
  "Thank you for holding. Are you currently experiencing these login issues with our web portal or through the mobile application?"
  └─> Topic: Online Banking Login & 2FA Issues (Conf: 0.99) | Urgency: 0.01 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:01:30 - 14:01:42] (12s) [Customer]
  "It's definitely the web portal; my 2FA authentication SMS code isn't arriving when I try to authorize our international SWIFT wire transfer to Frankfurt."
  └─> Topic: Online Banking Login & 2FA Issues (Conf: 0.90) | Urgency: 0.19 | Routing: AUTO-ROUTED

[14:01:42 - 14:01:48] (6s) [Agent]
  "Let me trigger a secondary authentication reset for your online profile right now."
  └─> Topic: Online Banking Login & 2FA Issues (Conf: 1.00) | Urgency: 0.06 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:01:48 - 14:01:58] (10s) [Customer]
  "Thanks. Once that wire clears, I also want to move £250,000 from my commercial savings into our managed equity portfolio."
  └─> Topic: Wealth Management & Advisory Services (Conf: 0.95) | Urgency: 0.03 | Routing: AUTO-ROUTED

--- Transcript 1 Cumulative Time-on-Topic (with Lookback Attribution) ---
  • Online Banking Login & 2FA Issues: 99 seconds (1.6 mins)
  • Wealth Management & Advisory Services: 10 seconds (0.2 mins)

Output — Transcript 2 (ambiguous fraud dispute, correctly escalates to a human):

==================================================
 BANKING TRANSCRIPT 2 (Lookback Telemetry)
==================================================
[14:00:00 - 14:00:06] (6s) [Agent]
  "Welcome to Northbridge Banking Group, how can I help you today?"
  └─> Topic: Continuation / Acknowledgment (Conf: 1.00) | Urgency: 0.01 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:00:06 - 14:00:18] (12s) [Customer]
  "I need urgent help with a multi-party international dispute involving compromised crypto wallet linkages and cross-border merchant chargebacks that span three different legal jurisdictions."
  └─> Topic: Suspicious Activity & Fraud Alerts (Conf: 0.67) | Urgency: 0.93 | Routing: HUMAN ESCALATE

[14:00:18 - 14:00:53] (35s) [Agent]
  "That sounds extremely complex and sensitive. I am going to place you on an extended security hold while I escalate your case directly to our Senior Fraud and Legal Arbitration Directorate."
  └─> Topic: Suspicious Activity & Fraud Alerts (Conf: 0.77) | Urgency: 0.72 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:00:53 - 14:01:28] (35s) [Agent]
  "Thank you for holding. Our fraud directors have reviewed the preliminary notes, and a specialised human agent is taking over the line to walk you through the evidentiary affidavit."
  └─> Topic: Suspicious Activity & Fraud Alerts (Conf: 0.96) | Urgency: 0.33 | Routing: [AGENT TURN — NO ROUTING]

[14:01:28 - 14:01:38] (10s) [Customer]
  "Thank you, please also make sure nobody touches my mortgage direct debit scheduled for tomorrow morning while this is sorted."
  └─> Topic: Standing Orders & Direct Debit Mandates (Conf: 1.00) | Urgency: 0.24 | Routing: AUTO-ROUTED

--- Transcript 2 Cumulative Time-on-Topic (with Lookback Attribution) ---
  • Suspicious Activity & Fraud Alerts: 82 seconds (1.4 mins)
  • Standing Orders & Direct Debit Mandates: 10 seconds (0.2 mins)

If you're already building with Claude, Codex (or any other supported CLI), TypeSafe's plugin is designed to drop into your existing setup with ease.

Ready to architect reliable AI decisioning in your enterprise?

From agentic workflows to parallel sampling, our team brings deep generative AI expertise to every engagement - helping you stop wrestling with semantic variance and hallucinated confidence, and start building more powerful, efficient, and cost-effective automation from the moment we sit down.

Get in touch to explore what parallel sampling could do for your data pipelines with a technical discovery call.

 

References

[1] House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2025) HMRC Customer Service and Accounts (Twenty-Ninth Report of Session 2024–25). UK Parliament, 22 January 2025. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/46301/documents/233200/default/ (Accessed: 21 September 2026).

[2] ContactBabel (2024) UK Contact Centre Decision-Makers' Guide. ContactBabel, March 2024. Available at: https://www.contactbabel.com/the-uk-contact-centre-decision-makers-guide/ (Accessed: 21 September 2026).

[3] Shrivastava, R. (2026) 'This $200 Million Startup Wants To Fix AI's Overconfidence Problem', Forbes, 15 September 2026; Fernholz, T. (2026) 'A new kind of AI model from a ChatGPT inventor is thrilling developers', TechCrunch, 18 September 2026. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/the-prompt/2026/09/15/this-200-million-startup-wants-to-fix-ais-overconfidence-problem/ & https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-from-a-chatgpt-inventor-is-thrilling-developers/ (Accessed: 21 September 2026). 

[4] TypeSafe AI (2026) API reference. TypeSafe AI. Available at: https://docs.typesafe.ai/api (Accessed: 21 September 2026).